When an electronics failure results in a legal dispute, insurance claim, or regulatory inquiry, the quality of the technical investigation determines the outcome. Aremac Labs provides independent, evidence-based failure analysis reports and expert opinions that are written to withstand technical and legal scrutiny. Our founder, Rajasekaran Ganeshkumar Ph.D., has experience in forensic failure analysis engagements across consumer electronics and has worked with legal teams, insurers, and manufacturers across India and internationally.
What we provide
We provide written expert opinions and failure analysis reports for product liability matters, insurance subrogation claims, consumer disputes, supplier warranty negotiations, and regulatory investigations. Our reports identify root cause, assess contributing factors, and clearly distinguish between manufacturing defects, design deficiencies, and misuse or abuse. We can also provide rebuttal analysis of opposing expert reports.
Product liability matters
If your product has allegedly caused injury, fire, or property damage, an independent technical investigation is essential. We investigate the failed product, assess whether the failure mode is consistent with the alleged cause, and provide a written opinion on causation. Our reports are structured for use in court proceedings, arbitration, or settlement negotiations.
Insurance investigations
Insurers and loss adjusters engaged in electronics-related claims — including fire investigations, product recalls, and supply chain disputes — need technically credible independent opinions. We work directly with insurers, loss adjusters, and their legal counsel to provide clear, impartial analysis of the physical evidence.
Supplier disputes and warranty claims
When a component or board supplier disputes a warranty claim, a technically defensible root cause analysis is the most effective tool for resolution. We provide analysis that identifies whether a failure originated in design, manufacturing, materials, or end-use conditions — with findings supported by physical evidence rather than assertion.
Our approach to expert engagements
We maintain scientific independence in all expert engagements. Our findings are based on physical evidence and established failure analysis methodology — not on what any party to a dispute wants the answer to be. This independence is what makes our opinions credible and effective.